Choosing Freedom Over Limitation Essay

Each and anyday, what I after part watch from the news reports immediately are all about crime, crime and all crime. Our beau monde is already filled with human universes dark sides and that is what is continuously being unleashed. What I wanted to say is that we need to have effective slipway to help our world to leave its bad ways. The role of the brass in the society is to enforce what is right and limit the wrong doings. But as what I dope observe, the more the politics limits its good deal, the more the commonwealth do terrible things.An example of that I have read that shows this example is the martial(a) Law brought down onto the Philippines in the early 1970s. Yes, at the beginning, the people follows the government beca office of the forced restriction but after years had passed, people revolted because they can non come across any longer what the government is doing to the people. It is not always that forced limit becomes effective to ruling people every wh ile. thither will be a point in time, when someone limits another person and doesnt stop him his freedom it will show its annoyance about that because what was taken external from him is his freedom.We must let the people do what they wanted to do. But we can let them as long as they dont do anything that will go against the rules. It is like when you are holding a handful of sand. When you just hold it with your palm up, nothing happens. But at the time when you squeeze your palms against the sand, the sand breaks off your hand, violently, like its trying to force back away. And also just what Saint Augustine has said, evil only gos on something good. There is not really an opposing force to everything good done of every people. So we must leave the responsibility of being good to the people and demarcation line might do just less.Although we know that there is a big and bad possibility that we choose freedom rather than limitation for people, that people will just abuse it, it is still the peoples responsibility of what they are doing. When they do bad things, then, punish them. It doesnt specify that when there is freedom, its only freedom ruling over the people. Of racetrack there must be someone or some radical that looks over peoples safety because what will be the use of freedom if all the people are just killing individually other or stealing things? But of course it is also up to the people what they wanted and what they signify that is better for them.Freedom or limitation? That is why there contrasting forms of government all over different countries in the world. Some countries prefer a democratic form of government because they wanted freedom of speech. Others wanted communism because they feel safer through the governments protection. And there are many other forms of government that people together take as a choice. The government has the full responsibility of its own peoples sake. It must provide them enough protection that can war rant that the people will not be harmed and perhaps will not harm. That is why, law enforcement was developed.It is being continuously improved to watch out everything regarding the societys peace and order. And also, this provides an invisible shield that also helps protect without victorious away freedom. A very powerful tool that human charitable created that manages civilizations. The question that I have answered is that whether or not I think freedom is better than forced limitation. For me, the question should not be exceptional in the choice between freedom and limitation. Yes, we can choose freedom, and also, we can choose limitation. But we must remember that anytime the two can exist together at the same time, just with the right amount of twain things.