Virtual Child Pornography Should be Legal :: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays

Virtual kid Pornography Should be LegalThis nation has several issues over which or so peoples minds freeze up, with the disastrous drug war probably leading the list. I dont share a feeling of squeamishness and horror when it comes to drugs What I dont want, I dont take, its that simple. And I dont spend time fretting that my neighbors might be toking, or snorting, in the privacy of their homes. Child soot is something else it pushes all kinds of emotional hot-buttons in me. sure I would agree with the majority that anyone who exploits children in a sexual trend is committing a serious offense, deserving of harsh punishment. And anyone who get his kicks catching at images of children in sexual situations, well, thats also pretty horrifying to my sensibilities. I am very glad that my own lust meter pegs when I look at fully grown women, non at some other subset of the population. Nevertheless, I feel moved to speak against the wave of hysteria that is exemplified by U.S . Rep. Henry Browns call for a Constitutional amendment to ban virtual child pornography. (Virtual child pornography is images that appear to be of children having sex, but which are in fact made-up, simulated by the miracles of modern computer graphics). Some who correspond such an amendment do so on the basis that the Constitution is non meant to cover specific legislative issues. That is true, but it misses the larger point, which comes down to basal rights, even for people we think generate horrifying tastes. To put it bluntly, children (and adults too, of course) have the right not to be sexually exploited, BUT, adults have the right to possess any material which does not directly exploit children. Yes, including virtual pornography. I think a strong case could be made that it should not be illegal for someone to possess images of ACTUAL child pornography The crime has been committed by the person exploiting the children, not the person view the picture. Nevertheless, in this column Im taking the less assertive position that solely pretend pictures of children dont warrant legal sanction. Think about this Take a serviette. key a big guy with an erect c***. Draw a much smaller figure giving him a b*** j**. You have just committed a felony. Take that napkin and stuff it in someone elses pocket.