Comparing and contrasting Achilles and other warriors Essay Example for Free

comparison and contrasting Achilles and other warriors EssayComparing and contrasting Achilles and other warriorsIntroduction Achilles is one of the main guinea pigs in Homers Iliad. Iliad is a legendary epic covering the formative years of Roman and Hellenic mythology. Iliad pursue glory, heroism, and love within the authority and influence of supernatural powers. Achilles possessed heroic strength and withal had close contact with the gods. Achilles had all the qualities of a grand warrior and he proved to be the most predominate man among the Achaean army. However his deeply rooted character barred his capacity to act with oneness and nobility. The rationale of this paper is to analyze the character of Achilles and examine how he was similar of differed from other heroic warriors. Achilles could not manage his pride or the fury that came about when his pride was injured. These attri thoes greatly affected Achilles action since he abandoned his fellow warriors because h e had been insulted before Agamemnon, his commander. Achilles even wished his fellow warriors to be killed by trojan warriors. He was driven by thirst for glory and was willing to sacrifice anything for his reputation. Achilles had extreme temper for example, though the transfer of Patroclus provoked him to reconcile with Agamemnon, this did not alleviate his fury but he directed his pettishness to swagger (Homer, 1990, p. 32). Achilles forfeited twelve Trojan men at the funeral of Patroclus, he in addition killed his opponents mercilessly and shamefully vandalized the the Great Compromiser of Hector. These events reveal Achilles great anger because he was mourning the close of Patroclus. Achilles pride, bloodlust and wrath affected him adversely (Virgil, 2006, p. 42). Achilles is acknowledge as the greatest warrior in Achaian army and no other warrior could match him as a fighter. Achilles has a great sense of social order because he decided to act during the encrust that w as consuming the soldiers at Achaian camp. Agamemnon, Achilles kind did not act so Achilles decided to find out the cause of the plague by calling for a congregation of the entire army. Achilles is argumentative and petulant because he argues that though Agamemnon gets the scoop prizes from war, he never worked for them. In the course of argument, Achilles almost killed Agamemnon, though he was saved from carrying out the heinous act by goddess Athena. Achilles believed that the quarrel between him and the king was righteous and same as the war against Trojan army. Achilles major characteristic was excessive pride because he remained angry even after Agamemnon promise to put across Briseis alongside other gifts (Vigil, 2006, p. 47). Gilgamesh is a warrior who fears death throughout George XIII epic. Achilles on the other hand is overly very keen with his metaphoric wickedness that can only take place after the death of his earthly life. Gilgamesh and Achilles have a toilet of s imilarities, which include dynamic attitude on death and life centered. They have similar attitudes especially when their heroic comrades died. The death of Patroclus touched Achilles very much whereas the death of Enkidu also caused much distress to Gilgamesh. Achilles and Gilgamesh argon two semi-divine heroes who have various matching characteristics and life-events, and they focused a lot with their somebody lives, but not relatively in the same approach. Achilles and Gilgamesh sh be fundamental similarities in their mortal lives. Each of them is a child of a goddess and a mortal man who happens to be a king. Achilles is a son of Thetis and has an exceptional rapport which enables him to speak with the gods with the help of Thetis (Homer, 1990, p 27). Gilgamesh on the other hand is regarded as one third human and two third god, which makes him to stand out as an exceptional character that exists in relationships with both the mortal world and divine world. Iliad relates the pree minence of Achilles and Gilgamesh in battle where they reveal themselves as headstrong warriors. Neither Achilles nor Gilgamesh is concerned with romantic and family relationships. The major relationship these epic heroes have is with their mothers, where they seek aegis and guidance. Through this rapport, they are able to gain development and wisdom. Achilles can also be compared to other heroes much(prenominal) as Aenes since their lives is determined by supernatural powers. In the book Iliad and Aeneid, Achilles and Aenes are characters who reveal their chivalry and bravely. In the books, Aenes and Achilles are chosen by gods and favored in various periods of their lives (Homer, 1990, p.26). These characters have foreordained death and fate, they are sons of gods and they have specific accomplishment and mission in their lives. The major difference between Achilles and Gilgamesh is on anger management. Even after the death of his friend Enkidu, Gilgamesh remains cool and does not translate his fury to anyone, but Achilles anger could not be controlled after the death of Patroclus. Gilgamesh mourns the death of his friend by ritually puff his clothes and hair, but Achilles mourns the death of Patroclaus by killing several Trojan warriors. An in depth analytic thinking of the epics of the era reveal contrasting features of the heroes. The circumstance, the physical features and situation might be similar, but the discrepancy is in the first place due to mental and intellect framework of the heroes. Aenes fought major battles just like Achilles, but their fate was different. Achilles was predestined to die in the battle, while Aenes was predestined to be an architect of a big town in the planet. Achilles was more of a feral enemy and fierce warrior and his task was to wrestle and triumph over flaming(a) wars. On the other hand, Aenes was more civilized and constructive in comparison to arrogant Achilles. Achilles is violent, stubborn, ruthless and hea d-on and had a capacity to kill Trojan warriors ruthlessly in the battlefield. Achilles battle and attack intended huge massacre. On contrary, Aenes is more placid and sober. Aenes as a warrior had adorable features of restraint, chastity, discipline and love. He was a square leader who never left his comrades. Aenes led the warriors to pursue new home and new culture. He was a fighter, but not even once did he display emotions and power in arbitrary and cruel manner (Vigil, 2006, p. 74). In conclusion, Achilles was a great warrior, but he was a merciless fighter who killed umpteen Trojan warriors. Achilles shared similar features with other heroes in the epics. These heroes fate was usually predestined and they were mostly sons of gods. They desire advice from their mothers which helped them to develop and gain wisdom. However, an in depth analysis on the character of these heroes depict that there are some differences. Achilles was a violent warrior as compared to most heroes w ho were able to manage their fury. In addition, Achilles, Aenes and Gilgamesh were heroes of their times.ReferencesHomer, Robert Fagles, and Bernard Knox. The Iliad. New York Viking,1990. Print. expect Nash Wolff. Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Heroic Life. Journal of the American Oriental Society 89.2(1969) 392-398. Web.Virgil, R. Fagles, B. Knox, and S. Callow. The Aeneid. New York Penguin Audio,2006. Print.Source document